Imagine what 50 million could do if used to create a spay/neuter fund available to all shelters and rescues. I'm so tired of state's spending huge sums just to continue to explore the problem and experiment with the nonsense like the ideas like 'community sheltering' which is dangerous and irresponsible and will once again leave the responsibility for saving animals on individuals who cannot look away (but too often don't have the resources or the expertise to save them). Common sense is simply not common anymore.
Thank you, Cara, for your thoughtful comment! I couldn’t agree more—$50 million could make a world of difference if it were invested in spay/neuter programs that directly address the root cause of overpopulation. It’s frustrating to see so much money spent on initiatives that don’t tackle the heart of the issue, leaving individuals and communities to carry the burden. Common sense solutions like spay/neuter are right in front of us, and it’s time we prioritize them. Thank you for sharing your perspective—it’s voices like yours that can help steer the conversation in the right direction!
I can only come away with one assumption when I see a refusal to utilize the most obvious preventive remedy: they don't want to solve the problem. Is it possible that some fear working themselves out of a job? When the majority of a community recognizes what is needed and those in the position to employ the necessary measures don't follow up, we all have to wonder.
It is hard not to question the motives when such an obvious and effective solution is deprioritized. It does make you wonder if some fear losing their need for funding or even their jobs. When the community sees the solution clearly, but those in charge don’t act on it, it’s definitely cause for concern. Let’s hope more people start asking these important questions and pushing for real change!
While highlighting California, these ethical dilemmas resound all across the US. Public safety and health vs the humane treatment of companion animals are being discussed or should be discussed in most of the states.
Melissa, you are correct! The legal and ethical dilemmas highlighted in California are indeed reflective of broader challenges faced by animal shelters across the U.S. Balancing public safety and health with the humane treatment of companion animals is a conversation that needs to happen nationwide. As more communities grapple with overpopulation, shelter overcrowding, and ethical considerations, it's crucial that we continue to discuss and reassess our approaches to ensure the best outcomes for both animals and people. Thanks for raising this important point!
And when they elected to ignore and not meaningfully bolster SnN, they represented that altering animals had already been “successful” and sufficiently utilized in communities- ignoring that over 90% of all stray dog intake in CA is unaltered. They put their ego and need for Newsom’s approval over the animals. Koret has absolutely facilitated increased breeding and horrible deaths for animals. All the litters and injuries certainly increase business for CA veterinarians too.
Hilary, thank you for sharing your perspective. It is frustrating to see how the focus on spay/neuter programs has been downplayed, especially when the data clearly shows that so many stray animals remain unaltered. The fact that this is being overlooked in favor of policies that seem more about optics than real solutions is disheartening. And you're right—this approach not only harms the animals but also seems to create more work for veterinarians dealing with the resulting litters and injuries. It’s time we refocus on common-sense solutions like spay/neuter programs that address the root of the problem instead of perpetuating it. Thank you for highlighting this important issue!
Thank you, Christine, for your thoughtful comment and for sharing such detailed insight into what’s happening in San Diego. It’s heartbreaking to hear about the ongoing legal battle and the disturbing practices that have come to light. You’re absolutely right—this issue goes far beyond California, and it’s crucial that we connect the dots and hold these organizations accountable. The fact that SD Humane Society, with all its resources, is choosing to defend such inhumane policies is alarming. I’ve been following the case from afar, and hope justice is served for the thousands of cats affected by these practices. Thank you again for your dedication to this cause and for fighting on behalf of these animals. We are indeed at a crossroads, and your voice is making a difference!
Imagine what 50 million could do if used to create a spay/neuter fund available to all shelters and rescues. I'm so tired of state's spending huge sums just to continue to explore the problem and experiment with the nonsense like the ideas like 'community sheltering' which is dangerous and irresponsible and will once again leave the responsibility for saving animals on individuals who cannot look away (but too often don't have the resources or the expertise to save them). Common sense is simply not common anymore.
Thank you, Cara, for your thoughtful comment! I couldn’t agree more—$50 million could make a world of difference if it were invested in spay/neuter programs that directly address the root cause of overpopulation. It’s frustrating to see so much money spent on initiatives that don’t tackle the heart of the issue, leaving individuals and communities to carry the burden. Common sense solutions like spay/neuter are right in front of us, and it’s time we prioritize them. Thank you for sharing your perspective—it’s voices like yours that can help steer the conversation in the right direction!
I can only come away with one assumption when I see a refusal to utilize the most obvious preventive remedy: they don't want to solve the problem. Is it possible that some fear working themselves out of a job? When the majority of a community recognizes what is needed and those in the position to employ the necessary measures don't follow up, we all have to wonder.
It is hard not to question the motives when such an obvious and effective solution is deprioritized. It does make you wonder if some fear losing their need for funding or even their jobs. When the community sees the solution clearly, but those in charge don’t act on it, it’s definitely cause for concern. Let’s hope more people start asking these important questions and pushing for real change!
While highlighting California, these ethical dilemmas resound all across the US. Public safety and health vs the humane treatment of companion animals are being discussed or should be discussed in most of the states.
Melissa, you are correct! The legal and ethical dilemmas highlighted in California are indeed reflective of broader challenges faced by animal shelters across the U.S. Balancing public safety and health with the humane treatment of companion animals is a conversation that needs to happen nationwide. As more communities grapple with overpopulation, shelter overcrowding, and ethical considerations, it's crucial that we continue to discuss and reassess our approaches to ensure the best outcomes for both animals and people. Thanks for raising this important point!
And when they elected to ignore and not meaningfully bolster SnN, they represented that altering animals had already been “successful” and sufficiently utilized in communities- ignoring that over 90% of all stray dog intake in CA is unaltered. They put their ego and need for Newsom’s approval over the animals. Koret has absolutely facilitated increased breeding and horrible deaths for animals. All the litters and injuries certainly increase business for CA veterinarians too.
Hilary, thank you for sharing your perspective. It is frustrating to see how the focus on spay/neuter programs has been downplayed, especially when the data clearly shows that so many stray animals remain unaltered. The fact that this is being overlooked in favor of policies that seem more about optics than real solutions is disheartening. And you're right—this approach not only harms the animals but also seems to create more work for veterinarians dealing with the resulting litters and injuries. It’s time we refocus on common-sense solutions like spay/neuter programs that address the root of the problem instead of perpetuating it. Thank you for highlighting this important issue!
Complications are there to be overcome
Very Zen! The obstacle is the way... ;-)
Thank you, Christine, for your thoughtful comment and for sharing such detailed insight into what’s happening in San Diego. It’s heartbreaking to hear about the ongoing legal battle and the disturbing practices that have come to light. You’re absolutely right—this issue goes far beyond California, and it’s crucial that we connect the dots and hold these organizations accountable. The fact that SD Humane Society, with all its resources, is choosing to defend such inhumane policies is alarming. I’ve been following the case from afar, and hope justice is served for the thousands of cats affected by these practices. Thank you again for your dedication to this cause and for fighting on behalf of these animals. We are indeed at a crossroads, and your voice is making a difference!