6 Comments
Aug 15·edited Aug 15Liked by Ed Boks

I think it's really ignorant to think that a polar bear won't try to attack or chase you if it's not hungry if you come across one in the Arctic. Climate change and human development are pushing their territories into smaller and smaller areas. I really hope that the companies that are developing industries there allow the indigenous people to lead with how to protect from the polar bears and what to do with your food, etc. They're a vanishing endangered species, we have to have better interventions than shoot them. Large predators are vanishing everywhere on Earth, we have to do our part to not even invite them to come near us.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Squizz, for your feedback. It's essential we move beyond reactive measures, like shooting bears, and focus on proactive strategies that include education, non-lethal deterrents, and habitat protection. Together, with indigenous knowledge, we can work towards a future where polar bears and humans coexist safely in the Arctic.

Expand full comment

I feel for the worker, just a guy doing a job, and in this case a job I'd agree needs to be done, given the political realities of the day, but in general, I think it's up to humans, when we are invading a territory, to keep out of the way of predators, and I wonder why the bear was "put down," which is to say in unadorned language, killed. Was it necessary to protect anybody? the story was strangely unclear on that point. And what was the real tragedy here, that a person was killed? Or that the company failed to take the necessary steps to protect the species from each other?

Expand full comment
author

It is indeed a complex situation when human activities intersect with wildlife habitats. Balancing safety and conservation is challenging, and it's essential to consider both human and animal welfare. Your point about the need for clearer communication is valid, as understanding the reasons behind actions can help foster better coexistence strategies. It's crucial for companies and communities to implement measures that protect both people and wildlife, ensuring tragedies like these are minimized in the future.

Expand full comment
Aug 15Liked by Ed Boks

I have not been able to reconcile how humans believe that their rights and safety are being put at risk by Polar Bears. One species is living harmoniously with nature and a part of the natural ecosystem. The other is demanding the environment do, be, and sustain what it was never meant to support. Human hubris sees humans as above and beyond the true nature of

nature. This delusion is deadly. Maybe it’s time for them to read “The Midas Touch”?

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, AMS, for sharing a powerful reminder of the importance of humility and respect for the natural world. Polar bears have adapted to their environment over millennia, while human activities often disrupt these delicate balances.

Your reference to "The Midas Touch" is quite apt, as it highlights the consequences of unchecked desires and the need for thoughtful stewardship. As we continue to expand into natural habitats, it's crucial to find ways to coexist with wildlife, respecting their role in the ecosystem.

By fostering a deeper understanding of our impact and working towards sustainable practices, we can strive for a future where both humans and wildlife thrive. Thank you for encouraging this important dialogue!

Expand full comment